The other day I got a note from my science mentor Suzy Roebling
about a goliath grouper that was swimming around Molasses Reef in
distress. It had been speared. The animal was spotted by one of the glass
bottom boats while cruising over the south end of the reef. I heard a few days later the spear was
gone. We went there last week, but I did
not see our wounded friend. Will this
animal survive?
This is an area I dive frequently, so I know it well, and I’ll
bet I have photos of that particular goliath grouper. They are like St. Bernard puppies, in a fishy
way. You can get very close, within arms
length, easily. They are acclimated to
people. In fact the only place I have
seen a friendlier goliath grouper is on Aquarius Reef Base.
What kind of person would spear a goliath grouper? I don’t know if this act took place in the
Sanctuary Preservation Area or not, but the species is protected in Florida,
the southeast US and US Caribbean.
Swimming with a magnificent animal like a goliath grouper is an
encounter that attracts people to the Keys.
It is a Keys icon.
I don’t spearfish, but I do respect the rights of folks that do,
when it is done correctly. I am not
railing against spearos. Just this
one.
A discussion of an act like this could bring in a lot of other
topics. It could include a wide range of
things like lack of sufficient resources for law enforcement, all the way to
applying more severe penalties for perpetrators. How do we, as a community, protect our marine
resources from folks like this?
In my opinion that person should never be allowed in the
sanctuary again. They banned Pete Rose
from baseball - we should be able to ban blatantly disrespectful, harmful
people from our sanctuary. Period. And I don’t recall Pete doing damage to
anyone but himself. On top of that, he
came forward and laid it all out on the table.
I will not be taking bets on this person doing the same.
Right after the grouper incident, I received an assignment from
Chris Bergh, the chairman of our working group.
The assignment: “Based on your knowledge and experience how would you
define "Ecosystem Protection" in 150 words or less?”
Here’s the first thought that came to me: don’t allow misbehaving
morons in the sanctuary. Of course, I
was still engulfed in the goliath grouper malaise, but hey, wouldn’t that help?
How does defining Ecosystem Protection fit with a speared goliath
grouper? Let’s see. Education is certainly an element of
protection. Law enforcement is certainly
a component of protection. The very
definition of protected areas - and the exceptions - are critical factors of
protection (why bother with regulations if you have exceptions? Atlas Shrugged, anyone?).
At first I thought this would be simple. But as I began to change my attitude from the
grouper incident to a more constructive thought process, limiting ecosystem
protection to 150 words became inherently more difficult.
Water quality and marine life.
Point and non-point pollution.
Perps. Casitas. Canal clean up. Acidification. Diver pressures. Fishing pressures. Connectivity and resilience. Causes or symptoms? On and on.
There is so much involved - and at stake - I have to be very
deliberate, precise and succinct in the words I select. To me it’s like writing a mission statement
for a start-up company. We need to cover
the uses and zones, emphasize adaptive management, and paint a sustainable
vision for the future. Books have been
written on those three topics. I have
one paragraph.
We live in a bountiful, complex place, unique in many ways in
this country. Our space merits
protection. While we have many programs
and initiatives in place, like coral restoration, upgrading wastewater systems
and controlling development, we are lacking in certain areas. See the Conditions Report for the details
(
http://floridakeys.noaa.gov/scipublications/condition.html).
Ecosystem protection involves many issues that touch all our
lives, and most people’s livelihoods.
So, here it is. Like it, hate it, give me and “A” or an “F”. Or better yet, give me your definition. Write to me.
Contribute your ideas. Come to
the meeting and deliver it during in the public comment period. I’d like to get your feedback.
Ecosystem Protection:
Conserving, preserving and sustaining geographic and temporal zones as a healthy, resilient
ecosystem hinges on enacting boundaries and regulations defining acceptable
uses within designated areas and times.
Effectively communicating and educating stakeholders and the public on
the nature, intent and uses of ecosystem resources is of paramount
importance. Properly resourced law
enforcement is necessary. The use of the
best available science, coupled with ongoing scientific inquiry is critical to
assess, benchmark, document and predict changes in conditions for sustainable
management of flora and fauna. Threats
to ecosystem resources, natural or man-made, need constant monitoring and
management intervention for mitigation, correction or elimination. Human interaction, socioeconomics,
biogeographic considerations, recreational and commercial uses all combine to
construct an overarching, holistic management process with the goal of
providing access for sustainable use of the ecosystem, with all stakeholders
having a role in the collaborative process.
I have seven words left from the 150: Clean the mess and protect
the rest!
As always, these are my thoughts, and are not the official views
of the agencies with oversight of the sanctuary.
Tim Grollimund is a
freelance photographer and PADI divemaster based in Key Largo. He can be reached at tim@timgimages.com or
through his web site at www.timgimages.com.
Tim is a member of the Ecosystem Protection Working Group for the
Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary Advisory Council.
Thanks
Following that excellent post I would like to thank Mr. Tim Grollimund for taking the time to be a guest blogger. Tim Grollimund is an outstanding underwater photographer and was my instructor when I was first starting out, take the time to check out some of his shots at
timgimages.